OpenMaintainer

AI-native workbench for open-source maintainers.

stable
Demo modeDeterministic fallback
First maintainer session

Run one calm maintenance loop before touching GitHub.

Focus plan

3 focus blocks can reduce release risk and contributor waiting today

55
minutes today
criticalrelease · 20m
Resolve high-priority bug #284

Release gate is blocked by this item

Release blocker is removed or converted into a tracked follow-up

highreview · 25m
Review risky PR #92

Review focus: error handling, adapter boundaries, regression surface

PR has a focused review path and validation checklist

Decision log

7 maintainer decisions logged: 5 ready, 1 needs review, 1 blocked

5
ready
1
review
1
blocked
Triage issue #284readymediumrespond

Maintainer approves suggested labels and reply before running commands

Priority: highTarget: issue3 maintainer steps
GitHub handoff
3 commands

gh issue edit 284 --repo openmaintainer/demo-repo --add-label "bug" --add-label "priority/high"

Triage issue #287readymediumrespond

Maintainer approves suggested labels and reply before running commands

Priority: highTarget: issue2 maintainer steps
GitHub handoff
3 commands

gh issue edit 287 --repo openmaintainer/demo-repo --add-label "bug" --add-label "priority/high"

Follow up issue #285readylowrespond

Maintainer approves suggested labels and reply before running commands

Priority: normalTarget: issue2 maintainer steps
GitHub handoff
2 commands

gh issue comment 285 --repo openmaintainer/demo-repo --body "Thanks for the proposal. Are you still interested in sending a focused PR for this? If yes, please keep the first change small so it is easy to review."

Follow up issue #286readylowrespond

Maintainer approves suggested labels and reply before running commands

Priority: normalTarget: issue2 maintainer steps
GitHub handoff
2 commands

gh issue comment 286 --repo openmaintainer/demo-repo --body "Thanks for the question. Is this still blocking you, or did the deterministic fallback answer your workshop use case?"

Review PR #92readylowreview

Maintainer reviews suggested focus and validation before posting

Priority: normalTarget: pull-request2 maintainer steps
GitHub handoff
2 commands

gh pr view 92 --repo openmaintainer/demo-repo --web

Human review required before close or release command

Priority: normalTarget: issue3 maintainer steps
GitHub handoff
3 commands

gh issue comment 287 --repo openmaintainer/demo-repo --body "This looks related to #284. I am going to keep #284 as the canonical thread so reproduction details stay in one place."

Prepare release draftblockedhighrelease

Release gate is blocked; do not run release command yet

Priority: normalTarget: release2 maintainer steps
GitHub handoff
1 command

gh release create --repo openmaintainer/demo-repo --draft --notes-file RELEASE_NOTES.md

Ownership routing

7 ownership routes assigned across 4 maintainer roles

2
Release captain
2
Triage maintainer
1
Review maintainer
2
Safety reviewer
Release captain
criticalrelease
Resolve high-priority bug #284

Release gate is blocked by this item

Thanks for reporting this. Could you share the exact command output, runtime version, OS version, and a minimal reproduction so we can verify the failure path?

Safety reviewer
criticaldecision
Prepare release draft

Release gate is blocked; do not run release command yet

Review before running: gh release create --repo openmaintainer/demo-repo --draft --notes-file RELEASE_NOTES.md

Safety reviewer
highdecision
Review duplicate issues #284/#287

Human review required before close or release command

Review before running: gh issue comment 287 --repo openmaintainer/demo-repo --body "This looks related to #284. I am going to keep #284 as the canonical thread so reproduction details stay in one place."

Review maintainer
highreview
Review risky PR #92

Review focus: error handling, adapter boundaries, regression surface

Thanks for the PR. I am going to focus review on error handling, adapter boundaries, and regression surface. Suggested validation before merge: Run existing unit tests before merge; Add regression coverage for changed edge cases.

Public status

Release is blocked; 6 contributor threads need maintainer attention; 2 starter tasks are open

Reply outbox

5 contributor replies are ready to send

5
ready replies
2
urgent

first-time-contributor

English

Thanks for reporting this. To help us reproduce it quickly, could you add exact command output, runtime and OS version, and minimal reproduction steps? Once those details are in the issue, a maintainer can verify the failure path.

中文

感谢反馈。为了帮助我们快速复现,请补充完整命令输出、运行时和 OS 版本和最小复现步骤。信息补齐后,维护者就可以验证失败路径并继续推进。

GitHub handoff
gh issue comment 284 --repo openmaintainer/demo-repo --body 'Thanks for reporting this. To help us reproduce it quickly, could you add exact command output, runtime and OS version, and minimal reproduction steps? Once those details are in the issue, a maintainer can verify the failure path.'

windows-user

English

Thanks for reporting this. To help us reproduce it quickly, could you add exact command output, runtime and OS version, and minimal reproduction steps? Once those details are in the issue, a maintainer can verify the failure path.

中文

感谢反馈。为了帮助我们快速复现,请补充完整命令输出、运行时和 OS 版本和最小复现步骤。信息补齐后,维护者就可以验证失败路径并继续推进。

GitHub handoff
gh issue comment 287 --repo openmaintainer/demo-repo --body 'Thanks for reporting this. To help us reproduce it quickly, could you add exact command output, runtime and OS version, and minimal reproduction steps? Once those details are in the issue, a maintainer can verify the failure path.'
PR #92: Refactor GitHub adapter error handlinghighreview · PR #92English / 中文

adapter-owner

English

Thanks for the PR. I am going to focus review on error handling, adapter boundaries, and regression surface. Suggested validation before merge: Run existing unit tests before merge; Add regression coverage for changed edge cases.

中文

感谢提交 PR。我会重点检查 error handling、adapter boundaries、regression surface。合并前建议验证:Run existing unit tests before merge;Add regression coverage for changed edge cases。

GitHub handoff
gh pr comment 92 --repo openmaintainer/demo-repo --body 'Thanks for the PR. I am going to focus review on error handling, adapter boundaries, and regression surface. Suggested validation before merge: Run existing unit tests before merge; Add regression coverage for changed edge cases.'
Issue #285: Add Chinese README quickstartnormalstarter · issue #285English / 中文

cn-maintainer

English

This is a good starter task. Suggested scope: Add a focused documentation change for the requested quickstart. Please open a small PR from starter/issue-285-chinese-readme-quickstart, link back to issue #285, and use the checklist in the PR body.

中文

这是一个适合开始贡献的任务。建议范围:Add a focused documentation change for the requested quickstart。请从 starter/issue-285-chinese-readme-quickstart 开一个小 PR,关联 issue #285,并在 PR body 里使用 checklist。

GitHub handoff
gh issue comment 285 --repo openmaintainer/demo-repo --body 'This is a good starter task. Suggested scope: Add a focused documentation change for the requested quickstart. Please open a small PR from starter/issue-285-chinese-readme-quickstart, link back to issue #285, and use the checklist in the PR body.'

Maintainer inbox

2 repositories, 86 open issues, 3 open pull requests

Most painful
openmaintainer/urgent-sdk
2
Repositories
86
Open issues
3
Open PRs
1
Critical repos
  • 82 open issues
  • Missing license
  • Oldest pull request is 14 days old
  • Issue response gap: Oldest open issue was updated 9 days ago
Next action
Triage issue #284

OSS evidence pack

Prepared for Codex for Open Source review: maintenance load, contributor impact, and human-approved automation use.

Why this repository qualifies

openmaintainer/demo-repo has 1,284 GitHub stars, 37 open issues, and active contributor traffic. OpenMaintainer shows concrete maintenance load: 6 contributor-facing blockers across 6 contributors, duplicate cleanup, stale follow-ups, PR review focus, and release preparation.

API credit usage

API credits will power maintainer automation: issue triage, contributor unblock queues, duplicate detection, pull request review focus, release notes, and evidence packs. All actions remain human-approved before touching GitHub.

Evidence
  • 37 open issues and 2 open pull requests need maintainer attention
  • 6 contributor-facing blockers across 6 contributors
  • 7 maintainer actions are ready for human-approved execution
  • 2 high-priority issue responses, 1 PR review workflows, and 1 release workflow
  • OSS readiness 90/100 and health 74/100 are tracked with repeatable checks
Codex for Open Source
Application packet

Form-ready answers for the official Codex for Open Source application.

GitHub repository URL

https://github.com/openmaintainer/demo-repo

Describe your role

Core maintainer

Why does this repository qualify?

openmaintainer/demo-repo has 1,284 GitHub stars, 37 open issues, and active contributor traffic. OpenMaintainer shows concrete maintenance load: 6 contributor-facing blockers across 6 contributors, duplicate cleanup, stale follow-ups, PR review focus, and release preparation.

I'm interested in...

Codex Security; API credits for my project

How will you use API credits for your project?

API credits will power maintainer automation: issue triage, contributor unblock queues, duplicate detection, pull request review focus, release notes, and evidence packs. All actions remain human-approved before touching GitHub.

Anything else we should know?

This project is built specifically around real OSS maintenance workflows: reducing contributor waiting time, surfacing the most painful queues first, and turning Codex output into reviewable maintainer actions instead of opaque automation.

Starter kit

2 starter tasks are ready for new contributors

This is a good starter task. Suggested scope: Add a focused documentation change for the requested quickstart. Please open a small PR from starter/issue-285-chinese-readme-quickstart, link back to issue #285, and use the checklist in the PR body.

starter/issue-285-chinese-readme-quickstart
Acceptance
  • Add a focused documentation change for the requested quickstart
  • Keep the change small enough for a first review
  • Include before/after context in the pull request body

This is a good starter task. Suggested scope: Add a short answer or example that resolves the question. Please open a small PR from starter/issue-286-question-can-the-triage-model-run-without-an-api, link back to issue #286, and use the checklist in the PR body.

starter/issue-286-question-can-the-triage-model-run-without-an-api
Acceptance
  • Add a short answer or example that resolves the question
  • Keep the change focused on one documented workflow
  • Include before/after context in the pull request body

Response SLA

6 contributor threads need attention: 6 overdue, 0 at risk

6
overdue
0
at risk
0
on track

Repro kit

2 bug reports need reproducible details before maintainers can act

Thanks for reporting this. To help us reproduce it quickly, could you add exact command output, runtime and OS version, and minimal reproduction steps? Once those details are in the issue, a maintainer can verify the failure path.

Checklist
  • Exact command output
  • Runtime and OS version
  • Minimal reproduction steps

Thanks for reporting this. To help us reproduce it quickly, could you add exact command output, runtime and OS version, and minimal reproduction steps? Once those details are in the issue, a maintainer can verify the failure path.

Checklist
  • Exact command output
  • Runtime and OS version
  • Minimal reproduction steps

Contributor impact

6 contributor-facing blockers across 6 contributors

6
contributors
4
blocked
4d
avg wait
Repository

openmaintainer/demo-repo

A demo repository used to show how OpenMaintainer helps maintainers triage issues and review pull requests.

GitHub
1,284
Stars
37
Open issues
2
Pull requests
74/100
Health
90/100
Readiness

Strengths

  • MIT license is discoverable
  • Active pull requests create a clear maintenance queue

Risks

  • 2 high-priority issue needs maintainer review
  • Open issue queue may become hard to scan manually

Next actions

  • Review high-priority triage items first
  • Ask for missing reproduction details before debugging
  • Keep release notes updated from active pull requests

Command queue

16 GitHub commands across 7 maintainer actions are staged for human-approved execution

Human approval gate

Commands are staged for maintainer review. Close and release commands are flagged before running.

Command safety
1
Safe
4
Review
2
Destructive

Safe: Read-only GitHub command

Review: Writes labels or comments

Destructive: Contains close, delete, or release command

2 review gates

PR handoff

1 pull request needs focused review handoff before contributors wait longer

Thanks for the PR. I am going to focus review on error handling, adapter boundaries, and regression surface. Suggested validation before merge: Run existing unit tests before merge; Add regression coverage for changed edge cases.

error handlingadapter boundariesregression surface
Validation
  • Run existing unit tests before merge
  • Add regression coverage for changed edge cases

OSS readiness

90/100
pass

License

MIT is visible to contributors

pass

Repository description

Description explains the project purpose

pass

Default branch

Default branch is main

warn

Issue load

Open issue count is high enough to need active triage

pass

Review queue

Pull request queue is reviewable

Quality signals

4 signals

Label coverage

2 of 4 open issues already have labels

50
  • 2 unlabeled open issues
  • 50% issue label coverage
  • Target label coverage 100%
  • Preferred labels bug, documentation, question, feature, needs-triage

Label unlabeled issues before deeper triage work

Issue response gap

Oldest open issue was updated 2 days ago

50
  • Oldest issue updated 2 days ago
  • Target response gap 1 days

Refresh older issue threads with a maintainer response

Pull request age

Oldest open pull request is 3 days old

67
  • 2 open pull requests
  • Target PR age 2 days

Assign review ownership for aging pull requests

Review load

2 open pull requests in the review queue

100
  • Review load score 100/100
  • Target open PRs 8

Review queue is small enough for focused maintainer attention

Maintenance queue

4 items

Thanks for opening this. This looks useful; a small focused PR with docs and tests would make it easier to review.

Labels
documentationneeds-triage

Similar issues

1 clusters
#284#287

Shared maintainer context: windows, install, fails, pnpm

Review together before asking contributors for duplicate reproduction details